home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.netspace.net.au!usenet
- From: astroboy@netspace.net.au (Paul Dossett)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications
- Subject: Re: Is MUI processor intensive?
- Date: 15 Feb 1996 08:28:02 GMT
- Organization: NetSpace Online Systems
- Message-ID: <1237.6619T1121T2904@netspace.net.au>
- References: <9601300825.AA003em@hectortd.demon.co.uk> <487.6609T1155T528@login.dknet.dk><754.6613T992T1265@netspace.net.au>
- <1843.6614T1133T2864@imaginet.fr> <909.6615T1139T859@aix1.danadata.dk>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup-a1-29.mel.netspace.net.au
- X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP) *UNREGISTERED*
-
- Henrik Dissing (hendis@aix1.danadata.dk) said:
- >On 10-Feb-96 21:19:09, UNREGISTERED VERSION wrote:
-
- >> Could it be because of a very inefficient design of your '040 board?
- >> With my 28MHz only PPS 040 for A2000, MUI is almost undetectable... ;-)
-
- >More likely, your reactivity is seriously damaged somehow :-)
-
- >I have the exact same configuration plus a Picasso II, and I find MUI
- >applications annoyingly slow compared to non-MUI dittos. I do run MUI
- >3.2 and my WB is 1024x768 in 8 colours.
- ^^^^^
- wahey! power user!
-
- Ah, good, it's not just me then, or my Fischer-Price computer.. :)
-
- >I'm not enough of a MUI-hater to keep away from all MUI programs (AmFTP
- >is an example of a great MUI program) but from two comparable programs I
- >always prefer the non-MUI one.
-
- Well, I love the Internet Movie Database program, and that's all I have MUI
- installed for. I'd like to use IBrowse, but currently it's just too dangerous
- to rely on.
-
-
- --
- Paul Dossett | Yamaha, Epiphone, Pearl, Paiste | Amiga 2000/040/21/365/3.1 __
- -------------| Bubble Bobble Deluxe Dvlp. Team | Amiga CD32/020/2/CD/3.1__///
- boo! : astroboy@netspace.net.au.. | '76 Toyota Corolla 1.2 \XX/
-
-